The Election Commission has drafted a social media policy to guide use of social media to report on elections. One of the guidelines restricts personal attacks, “vulagr, obscene or abusive language” among others. Are there any views on this? http://www.kuenselonline.com/2011/?p=36108
We often speaks of lots of media coming in market irrespective of less advertisement. But the issue out here is government are the main culprits, they provide ads to every media house without even looking to reach and quality of the media house thus wasting lots of public money which could be used to other social causes.
question out here is “ARE WE GOING TO STAND AND SPEAK OUT THAT OUR OUR MONEY (TAX AND OTHER INCOME THAT GOVT. DEDUCTS) ARE USED PROPERLY….?”
There are lots of issues concerning with the supply of woods to the society for the constructions, Thing is we need to preserve the forest which the constitution itself states. Now the problem here is that why those Saw-Millers are not ready to change the sawing technology which it could save lots of timber and can make it available for the large society rather then adapting on old technology and creating more waste then what it can actually provide. Changing into new technology can actually maintain the % of forest needed in the constitution and side by can also meet the demand of the society.